IMPROVEMENT OF CRUDE OIL–CONTAMINATED LATERITIC SOIL USING STEAM INJECTION AND PERIWINKLE SHELL ASH FOR ROAD SUBBASE APPLICATIONS
Keywords:
Steam Injection, Periwinkle shell Ash (PSA), Compaction (OMC and MDD), CBRAbstract
Contamination from petroleum hydrocarbons poses a significant threat to soil and groundwater systems, thereby endangering ecosystems, human health, and socio-economic sustainability. This study evaluates the combined effectiveness of steam injection remediation and periwinkle shell ash (PSA) stabilization in improving the geotechnical properties of crude oil–contaminated lateritic soil for road subbase applications. Steam injection was applied at durations of 1 hour, 1 hour 30 minutes, 2 hours, and 2 hours 30 minutes. The remediated soil was subsequently stabilized with PSA at incremental additions of 4% up to 16%. Geotechnical tests were conducted in accordance with BS 1377. Results showed that steam injection achieved a maximum total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) removal efficiency of 75.89% at 1 hour 30 minutes, beyond which efficiency declined. Compaction results indicated that the untreated soil had Maximum Dry Density (MDD) values of 1.60 Mg/m³ for British Standard Light (BSL) and 1.75 Mg/m³ for British Standard Heavy (BSH), which increased to peak values of 1.69 Mg/m³ and 1.88 Mg/m³, respectively, after treatment. Optimum moisture content (OMC) increased with PSA content, reaching 16.56% for BSL and 14.65% for BSH at 12% PSA. The untreated soil recorded an unsoaked CBR of 19.3%, while peak values of 65.78% for BSL and 83.48% for BSH were obtained at 8% PSA with 1 hour 30 minutes of steam injection. Soaked CBR improved from 6.81% to 31.82% for BSL and 49.64% for BSH, satisfying Nigerian General Specifications for subbase materials. The study demonstrates that the combined use of steam injection and PSA provides a sustainable and effective method for improving crude oil contaminated lateritic soils for road subbase material.References
D. Daâssi and F. Q. Almaghribi, “Petroleum‑contaminated soil: environmental occurrence and remediation strategies,” 3 Biotech, vol. 12, no. 6, Art. 139, Jun. 2022, doi:10.1007/s13205‑022‑03198‑z. (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
A. Elgazali, H. Althalb, I. Elmusrati, H. M. Ahmed, and I. M. Banat, “Remediation approaches to reduce hydrocarbon contamination in petroleum‑polluted soil,” Microorganisms, vol. 11, no. 10, Art. 2577, Oct. 2023, doi:10.3390/microorganisms11102577. (mdpi.com)
M. S. Almutairi, “Determination of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) in weathered oil contaminated soil,” Environ. Eng. Res., vol. 27, no. 5, Art. 210324, 2022, doi:10.4491/eer.2021.324. (eeer.org)
M. Khamehchiyan, A. M. Charkhabi, and M. Tajik, “Effects of crude oil contamination on the geotechnical properties of clayey and sandy soils,” Eng. Geol., vol. 89, pp. 220–229, 2007. (nijotech.com)
A. Jamrah, A. Al‑Futaisi, H. Hassan, and S. Al‑Oraimi, “Petroleum contaminated soil in Oman: evaluation of bioremediation treatment and potential for reuse in hot asphalt mix concrete,” Environ. Monit. Assess., vol. 124, no. 1‑3, pp. 331–341, Jan. 2007, doi:10.1007/s10661‑006‑9230‑9. (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, SW‑846 Method 9071B: n‑Hexane Extractable Material (HEM) for Soil, Sludge, and Solid Samples, EPA, 1996. (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Soil Thermal Remediation Guidelines, EPA, 2004. (nemi.gov)
J. A. Oke, N. O. Obaji, and A. A. Ikoya, “Strength characteristics of oyster shell ash and periwinkle shell ash stabilized lateritic soil for pavement construction,” NIPES J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 72–89, Dec. 2022, doi:10.5281/zenodo.7393737. (journals.nipes.org)
E. Segun Nnochiri, “Effects of periwinkle shell ash on lime‑stabilized lateritic soil,” J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. XX–XX, Nov. 2017, doi:10.4314/jasem.v21i6.4. (doaj.org)
R. K. Etim, I. C. Attah, A. O. Eberemu, and P. Yohanna, “Compaction behaviour of periwinkle shell ash treated lateritic soil for use as road sub‑base construction material,” J. GeoEng., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 179–190, 2019, doi:10.6310/jog.201909_14(3).6. (ouci.dntb.gov.ua)
B. Bhuyan and P. Pandey, “Remediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil using hydrocarbonoclastic rhizobacteria, applied through Azadirachta indica rhizosphere,” Int. J. Phytoremediation, vol. 24, no. 13, pp. 1444–1454, 2022, doi:10.1080/15226514.2022.2033689. (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
British Standard 1377: Part 4, “Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes,” British Standards Institution, London, UK, 1990.
ASTM D1883‑16, “Standard test method for California bearing ratio (CBR) of laboratory‑compacted soils,” ASTM Int., West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016.
M. D. Gidigasu, Laterite Soil Engineering — Pedogenesis and Engineering Principles, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, 1976.
S. A. Ola, “Geotechnical properties and behaviour of some stabilized Nigerian lateritic soils,” Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 145–160, 1978.
N. Yusuf, G. H. Yunusa, A. Suleiman, and Z. A. Talib, “The Effect of Periwinkle Shell Ash (PSA) On Geotechnical Properties of Lateritic Soil for Road Construction Application,” Platform: A Journal of Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 52–61, 2024. (atbuftejoste.com.ng)
E. Segun Nnochiri and O. O. Olufikayo, “Geotechnical properties of lateritic soil stabilized with periwinkle shell ash in road construction,” Int. J. Adv. Eng. Manag. Sci., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 484–487, May 2016. (ijaems.com)
B. A. Mekonnen, T. A. Aragaw, and M. B. Genet, “Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil: a review on principles, degradation mechanisms, and advancements,” Front. Environ. Sci., vol. 12, Feb. 2024, doi:10.3389/fenvs.2024.1354422. (frontiersin.org)
M. Heron, D. Smith, and P. Jones, “Laboratory-scale thermal remediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 650–656, 1998.
F. Udoh and C. Ogbuagu, “Thermal treatment of crude oil–contaminated soil in laboratory conditions,” J. Environ. Eng. Sci., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 221–229, 2012.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Introduction to Thermal Remediation Technologies, EPA/540/R-04/101, Washington, DC, 2004.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ADVANCED JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENTIFIC APPLICATIONS

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.